This is a contentious point. Should engineers and designers talk about AM or 3D printing? Does it depend on who they are talking to?
Additive manufacturing and the manufacturing techniques that fall under the umbrella of AM are commonly referred to by a number of terms. More significant than the label ‘rapid prototyping’ has been the adoption of ‘3D printing’ as a blanket label for all AM techniques. ‘3D printing’ is technically incorrect because it is a specific technology using print heads to deposit polymer in a 3D fashion and not a term that should be used for all AM techniques.
The mass media has adopted the term 3D printing because of the similarities with consumer technologies, and so it can be visualised by the general public. Other labels and brand names coined in the infancy of AM have lingered but to a lesser extent.
However, engineers need a more robust terminology. In this course, additive manufacturing has been chosen as the term to use for two reasons:
There is a lot of hype about AM. Although some publications have very little scientific and engineering rigour, some are informative. Do a quick internet search to find a publication about AM as a technique for the production of fully functional components. Find an example of each of the following:
Write down a few sentences on each piece of information in the box below. Comment on how the information would have been written differently if it had been written for a different audience – for example, how would the news story be rewritten for a scientific paper, and vice versa.